Even though raw, organic milk is known to provide various health benefits, a Harvard researcher and pediatrician believes that conventional milk and dairy products are actually harmful.
Keep reading to learn more about his research and the alternatives he suggests.
DAVID LUDWIG’S RESEARCH
According to Ludwig`s research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, the side effects of sugar-sweetened drinks are already well-known and confirmed by many studies. Excessive consumption of sugar has been associated with diabetes, inflammatory-related pain, obesity, etc.
Due to the negative effect it has on our health, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the United States Department of Agriculture, and other organization are against the consumption of calories from sugary drinks.
However, they still promote reduced-fat milk, which is actually the only calorie-containing beverage promote. The RDA of this milk is three cups a day.
“THIS RECOMMENDATION TO DRINK THREE CUPS A DAY OF MILK – IT’S PERHAPS THE MOST PREVAILING ADVICE GIVEN TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC ABOUT DIET IN THE LAST HALF CENTURY. AS A RESULT, AMERICANS ARE CONSUMING BILLIONS OF GALLONS OF MILK A YEAR, PRESUMABLY UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT THEIR BONES WOULD CRUMBLE WITHOUT THEM,” SAYS DAVID LUDWIG.
As far as Ludwig is concerned, if the USDA is recommending to drink reduced-fat milk, it is also inadvertently encouraging the consumption of added sugars – a piece of advice that goes against all the research saying not to consume sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages.
The idea of consuming low-fat milk or chocolate milk cancels out the whole reasoning for the recommendation in the first place since the fats are simply being replaced with dangerous sugars.
“The worst possible situation is reduced-fat chocolate milk: you take out the fat, it’s less tasty. So to get kids to drink 3 cups a day, you get this sugar-sweetened beverage,” Ludwig says. “…we can get plenty of calcium from a whole range of foods. On a gram for gram basis, cooked kale has more calcium than milk. Sardines, nuts seeds beans, green leafy vegetables are all sources of calcium.”
The Case Against Low-Fat Dairy, and Other Dangers of Milk
Even though there is a point in Ludwig’s analysis and criticism of the USDA’s recommendations, there is far more to the full-fat vs reduce-fat argument.
In truth, there are lots of factors to stay away from fats like trans- fats and refined polyunsaturated fats in veggie oils, such as canola, sunflower, corn, and soy. Nevertheless, the proof that the consumption of saturated fats from grass-fed land animals, coconut oil, and milk, is still gradually emerging. According to a 2010 analysis published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, “there is no substantial evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is connected with an enhanced danger of [coronary heart disease or heart disease]”.
Additionally, the consumption of full-fat milk items supplies numerous benefits. It has actually been found that its pure state, full-fat dairy promotes heart health, lowers bowel cancer risk, promotes weight-loss, keeps diabetes in check and helps in vitamin absorption. However, while pure dairy (raw, natural, and coming from grass-fed animals) is great for you, standard milk may be harmful.
Make sure you inform yourself what your dairy products consists of prior consuming it. Standard milk might contain prescription antibiotics, pain relievers, and numerous more.